Home » Ethics panel clears Gallego as Luna calls him a creep

Ethics panel clears Gallego as Luna calls him a creep

By

–

Ruben Gallego

WASHINGTON — The House Ethics Committee has cleared Rep. Ruben Gallego of any wrongdoing, according to a statement released Monday, effectively ending a probe that had lingered over the Arizona Democrat. The panel found no evidence to support the allegations that prompted the investigation. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican, was not impressed.

“Once a creep, always a creep,” Luna declared in a brief statement following the committee’s announcement. Luna has been one of Gallego’s most vocal critics on Capitol Hill, though the ethics panel’s findings undercut the thrust of her attacks.

The committee did not detail the specific nature of the original complaint against Gallego. Investors will note the timing: the clearance removes a potential political liability for Gallego as he weighs a Senate run in Arizona, a key battleground state. The ethics cloud had been a talking point for Republican operatives targeting the Democrat’s fundraising operation.

With the cloud lifted, Gallego’s campaign team can pivot fully to general election messaging without the distraction of a pending ethics review. The Ethics Committee operates under strict confidentiality rules, so the precise allegations against Gallego were never made public.

What is known: the panel’s investigative subcommittee reviewed the matter and voted unanimously to dismiss the case. Such unanimous votes are rare in the often-partisan committee, suggesting the claims lacked evidentiary support. Luna’s sharp response signals that Republicans intend to keep Gallego’s character in the spotlight regardless of the official finding.

The phrase “once a creep, always a creep” is likely to appear in campaign mailers and digital ads targeting swing voters in Arizona. Whether that message lands with voters who see an official clearance is an open question. What to watch next: Gallego’s fundraising numbers for the second quarter, due in mid-July, will be the first hard data point showing whether the ethics cloud suppressed donor enthusiasm.

If contributions held steady or rose, the Luna attack loses its financial sting. If they dipped, the “creep” label may have done real damage despite the committee’s sign-off.

Either way, the Arizona Senate race just got a cleaner line of sight.

More stories by

Most read

US News

Courts & Law

Immigration

US Travel & Outdoors