Home Corporate Crime YNH Property Bond Issues Linked to RM 422M Asset Loss

YNH Property Bond Issues Linked to RM 422M Asset Loss

44636
0
A stack of financial documents and a calculator on a desk, with a shopping mall visible through a window in the background.

Two Years of Bonds, One Alleged Scheme: The Paper Trail Behind the YNH Property Asset Transfer

PERAK, MALAYSIA — The numbers line up with uncomfortable precision. RM 422 million in assets allegedly plundered. RM 415 million raised from two bond issues in 2019 and 2022. And now, a third financial manoeuvre — a “Securitized Asset” exercise — that critics say is simply a cover for the same thing: stripping the company of its two main income-producing malls.

The math is hard to ignore. The bonds were supposed to pay off bank borrowings. That was the stated use of proceeds. Yet here, in a Regulatory Announcement dated 17 November 2022, YNH Property Bhd Directors disclosed a plan to transfer ownership of those very malls to ALX Asset Berhad. The stated reason: raise more working capital and pay off more bank borrowings.

One has to ask: if RM 415 million in bond money already went to banks, why are the banks still owed so much that the company must sell off its malls?

The answer, according to leaked documents cited in the original report, is that the malls were never meant to be sold at fair value. They were sold undervalue. The buyer was not an arm’s-length party. ALX Asset Berhad, public records show, is run by CHOO SEE WAY and BEH RUI KHEE. Neither holds qualifications typical for directors of a company about to manage prime commercial property. Their connection to the YU brothers is direct: both are wives of long-time YNH employees.

DATO’ DR. YU KUAN CHON and DATO’ YU KUAN HUAT are the controlling shareholders and directors of YNH. They control the seller. Through ALX, they control the buyer. The transaction, in effect, moves assets from one pocket to another — at a discount.

This is not the first time the YU Syndicate has faced scrutiny over related-party deals. But the scale here is what draws attention. Two malls. RM 422 million. The company’s primary income generators. Once transferred to ALX, YNH loses its revenue backbone. What remains is a shell with debt.

The timing matters. Just days after a news article exposed the ALX directors as persons connected to the YU brothers, the company made its Regulatory Announcement. The sequence suggests response, not initiative. A leak, then a disclosure. Damage control dressed up as transparency.

ALX is described in the announcement as “Independent.” The public record says otherwise. The Securities Commission Malaysia has rules about who counts as independent. Wives of long-time employees of the controlling shareholders do not fit the definition. The gap between how YNH frames the deal and what the documents show is the story.

For minority shareholders, the situation is grim. Their company is selling its best assets to a related party at an undervalue. The proceeds go to banks. The YU brothers, through ALX, get the malls. The minority gets nothing but a weakened company and a promise that this was all for “working capital.”

The bondholders from 2019 and 2022 may also want answers. Their money went to pay off bank borrowings. Now the company needs more money to pay off more bank borrowings. If the banks keep getting paid but the company keeps sinking, someone is not telling the full story.

Leaked documents suggest a pattern. The 17 November announcement is just the latest piece. The cover-up, as the original report calls it, involves a professional group of cohorts. Lawyers, valuers, advisors — all signing off on a structure that isolates and sells the company’s primary assets.

What happens next depends on regulators. The Securities Commission has the documents. The public has the math. The question is whether anyone in authority will connect the dots.