Home » Florida Transparency Group Seeks Court Clarification on Sealed Rulings

Florida Transparency Group Seeks Court Clarification on Sealed Rulings

By

–

Florida Transparency Group Seeks Court Clarification on Sealed Rulings

TALLAHASSEE, September 14 — The Florida Center for Government Accountability asked the Leon County Circuit Court on Thursday to explain the legal basis for keeping its own rulings sealed in the Hope Florida grand jury matter, escalating a transparency fight that now sits at the intersection of judicial process and the political fortunes of Gov. Ron DeSantis. The motion, filed by FLCGA and its executive director Michael Barfield, seeks clarification of the court’s July 8 order.

The group wants the court to identify which of its rulings are sealed, cite the authority for sealing them, and provide the notice FLCGA needs to exercise appellate rights the court has already granted it.

A sealed record and a leaked report

The dispute gained urgency after CBS News Miami’s Jim DeFede reported that a state grand jury found the DeSantis administration “misappropriated” $10 million from a Medicaid settlement that was sent to the Hope Florida Foundation and later transferred into politics. The outlet said it obtained a copy of the sealed grand jury report, publishing its account on August 26, 2026. FLCGA argues that disclosure makes the underlying questions more consequential, not less.

In its motion, the group said the public now has an account of the grand jury’s findings “drawn from a source outside any lawful process,” while the judicial records showing how and why those findings were withheld remain sealed. Barfield drew the distinction sharply.

“The grand jury did its work. A judge has ruled on it. The public is entitled to know what the judge decided and why,” he said in a statement.

“The presentment may be confidential under the statute. The judge’s order is not.”

The notice problem

At the center of the filing is a procedural trap. Under the July 8 order, FLCGA is to be notified only if someone else files an appeal. If no one does, the 30-day window to seek appellate review expires — and FLCGA, barred from seeing “orders rendered,” never learns the order exists.

As the motion puts it, “A right of review that expires before its holder can learn of the ruling to be reviewed is not a right; it is its appearance.” The group also anticipates that the CBS News Miami disclosure could be used to argue the proceedings are concluded or moot. FLCGA contends the opposite, saying the leak heightens the need for the court to address its Rule 2.420 questions on the record.

Separately, FLCGA recently notched a legal win in its effort to obtain public records tied to the investigation of former Florida GOP Chair Christian Ziegler, a case that drew attention across the state. Strategically, the calculus for DeSantis is straightforward. A grand jury finding of misappropriated funds — even one locked behind seal — gives opponents a durable line of attack, and every week the court’s reasoning stays hidden prolongs the uncertainty.

What this signals is a slow-burning legal problem that the governor’s team cannot fully close while the records remain sealed. Watch whether the Leon County court clarifies its order, and whether an appeal is filed before the 30-day clock runs out.

Sources

More stories by

Most read

US News

Courts & Law

Immigration

US Travel & Outdoors