Andy Burnham wasn’t in the chamber. Didn’t need to be. The Mayor of Manchester owns the room now, and everyone in Westminster knows it.
Today’s Prime Minister’s Questions was a funeral parade, and Keir Starmer sat at the front, still alive, watching his party bury him. The mechanics are brutal.
Starmer announced his resignation Monday. By Tuesday, Kemi Badenoch was using his own MPs’ defections as a crowbar, prying apart whatever authority he had left. She pointed at Rachel Reeves, who didn’t bother to stand in Downing Street for Starmer’s resignation speech.
Then Reeves turned up for a selfie with Burnham. That’s not subtle.
That’s a declaration. The Chancellor has already picked her next boss. Badenoch didn’t stop there.
She went after Ed Miliband, tipped now as Burnham’s future Chancellor. “He was a failed Labour leader, rejected by the electorate, brought back from the wilderness,” she said. Then the knife: “It’s not the first time he’s betrayed someone close to him, is it?” A reference to 2010, when Miliband ran against his own brother for the Labour leadership.
The Tory leader was saying what half the Labour benches think but won’t say aloud. This government is a coalition of the wounded and the ambitious, held together by nothing but the scent of power shifting hands.
Starmer tried to talk up his achievements. Badenoch cut him off: “If it’s all so fantastic why is he resigning?” No answer came. None could.
The outgoing prime minister sat flanked by a grim-faced Reeves, who looked less like a loyal deputy and more like a hostage waiting for extraction. This was Starmer’s first grilling on his departure.
He had dodged making a Commons statement on the G7 summit, so PMQs became the venue. It was a bad venue. The catch for any lame-duck leader is brutal: you preside over a party that has already moved on.
Labour MPs have shown their support for Burnham. The political momentum is firmly with Manchester. Starmer is still prime minister in name.
In practice, he’s a placeholder. What this means for the country is straightforward.
A government in its final weeks cannot govern. Decisions get deferred. Bills stall.
The civil service waits for instructions from people who might not be in charge come autumn. Starmer’s emotional resignation speech Monday was meant to frame his legacy.
Today’s session stripped that framing away. He looked less like a statesman bowing out and more like a man counting the minutes until he can leave. The Conservative leader understood the assignment.
Badenoch didn’t need to attack Starmer directly — she let his own party’s behavior do the work. Her mockery was surgical: a dissection of a corpse that hadn’t stopped twitching. She knows Burnham is the next target.
She’s already drawing battle lines. Burnham stayed away from the chamber.
Smart move. Let the carcass cool before you claim the kill. His supporters are already in place.
The selfies are taken. The loyalty oaths are being whispered in corridors.
Starmer insisted he is “very pleased” that Burnham is back in the Commons. He has to say that. Everyone knows it’s a lie.
But in Westminster, the lie is the polite thing. The truth is what happened today: a prime minister sat through his own political autopsy, and the pathologist was from the other party, but the evidence came from his own side.
{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “NewsArticle”, “headline”: “Starmer faces Badenoch criticism after resignation announcement at PMQs”, “description”: “Andy Burnham wasn’t in the chamber. Didn’t need to be. The Mayor of Manchester owns the room now, and everyone in Westminster knows it. Today’s…”, “datePublished”: “2026-06-24T12:55:00+00:00T09:30:00+00:00”, “author”: {“@type”: “Person”, “name”: “Beatrice Bianchi”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “InfoPulse Today”, “url”: “https://newsfeed.infopulsetoday.com/”}}
