NEW YORK CITY, June 21 — On the ground in New York City, residents describe a sense of unease as the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (MI), a conservative-leaning think tank, continues to shape anti-LGBTQ+ policies. The scene is set against a backdrop of growing restrictions on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently signing a bill into law that prohibits local governments from spending money on DEI-related initiatives.
The law’s definition of DEI is adapted from a model bill by MI, which has been instrumental in informing the US administration’s policy on gender-affirming care. By nightfall, the implications of this law are still being felt, with LGBTQ+ advocates labeling it a “pride ban” that could threaten nondiscrimination ordinances, local pride events, and other services.
A sharp rise in anti-DEI bills has been observed since MI released its model bill in 2023, with several states introducing legislation that includes nearly identical language. This shift in focus towards undermining LGBTQ+ rights is a relatively recent development for MI, which prior to the 2020s did not have a strong focus on these issues. Quinnehtukqut McLamore, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Missouri, offers insight into why attacking LGBTQ+ rights may be an effective strategy for MI.
The effectiveness of this approach lies in its ability to garner support from individuals who may not typically align with right-wing agendas, but are willing to back anti-trans positions. As the US administration continues to collaborate with MI on policies related to gender-affirming care, the impact of these efforts is being felt across the country.
The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) controversial pediatric gender dysphoria report is a notable example of this collaboration, and its implications are still being understood. The Manhattan Institute’s history and strategy reveal a broader political goal that underlies its attacks on LGBTQ+ rights. By examining the organization’s past actions and current initiatives, it becomes clear that these efforts are part of a larger campaign to shape conservative policy.
As the situation continues to unfold, it is likely that MI’s influence will remain a significant factor in shaping the US administration’s approach to LGBTQ+ issues. Looking ahead, it will be important to watch how MI’s efforts continue to impact LGBTQ+ communities and the broader political landscape. As residents in New York City and beyond navigate the implications of these policies, they will be waiting to see how the situation develops and what the future holds for diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
In the coming days and weeks, the response from LGBTQ+ advocates and allies will be crucial in shaping the conversation around these issues. As the US administration continues to grapple with the complexities of gender-affirming care and DEI programs, the need for nuanced and informed discussion will only continue to grow.
By nightfall, the city will be waiting with bated breath to see what the future holds for these critical issues.
Sources
- How the Manhattan Institute Turned Anti-LGBTQ+ Politics Into …
- Boroughs of New York City – Wikipedia
